rsokolov (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
rsokolov) wrote2026-01-13 03:05 pm
rsokolov) wrote2026-01-13 03:05 pm
о подкастосфере
В последние годы сформировалась целая информационная экосистема, в которой стримеры берут интервью у подкастеров, а ютуберы потом из этого делают нарезку со своими комментариями. Не очень даже понятно, стоит ли ее по-прежнему считать "альтернативой" традиционным СМИ, или же, с учетом тесных контактов представителей ее правой части с нынешней администрацией, это уже и есть "мейнстрим".
Пишет Scott Greer (один из бывших соратников Такера Карлсона по Daily Caller):
The new media environment is far more democratic than the old one. Influencers instantly learn what their audience thinks of their content through replies and comments. They can even “ratio” a take they hate in just a few minutes. Influencers adjust accordingly and rarely ever go against their audience.
It’s a different world in alternative media compared to the traditional institutions. The audience is anti-establishment and wants to question mainstream narratives. This is often a good thing. [...] However, it comes with downsides. You can end up with an audience that wants to maximize entertainment above all considerations and will refuse to believe basic facts about life. In spite of the audience’s professed skepticism, many of them prove to be the most gullible people on planet Earth. As long as influencers present their idiotic notions as something the “elites” don’t want you to know, their “freethinking” listeners will gobble up without hesitation.
Пишет Scott Greer (один из бывших соратников Такера Карлсона по Daily Caller):
The new media environment is far more democratic than the old one. Influencers instantly learn what their audience thinks of their content through replies and comments. They can even “ratio” a take they hate in just a few minutes. Influencers adjust accordingly and rarely ever go against their audience.
It’s a different world in alternative media compared to the traditional institutions. The audience is anti-establishment and wants to question mainstream narratives. This is often a good thing. [...] However, it comes with downsides. You can end up with an audience that wants to maximize entertainment above all considerations and will refuse to believe basic facts about life. In spite of the audience’s professed skepticism, many of them prove to be the most gullible people on planet Earth. As long as influencers present their idiotic notions as something the “elites” don’t want you to know, their “freethinking” listeners will gobble up without hesitation.
![[syndicated profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/feed.png){kind=small}
